|
Notes about the vegetation of Colorado
|
|
|
Ecological Systems of Colorado
|
|
|
The Colorado Natural Heritage Program page on Ecological Systems of Colorado is found at:
https://cnhp.colostate.edu/projects/ecological-systems-of-colorado/
.
|
|
Literature Cited:
- Faber-Langendoen, Don, Ralph H. Crawford, and David L. Tart, 2009.
- Federal Geographic Data Committee, 2008.
- Jennings, Michael D., Don Faber-Langendoen, Orie L. Loucks, Robert K. Peet,m and David Roberts, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Comparison of published vegetation types.
|
|
|
| CNHP, 2005 | O'Shea-Stone, 2002 | Kilburn & White, 1992 | Zeise, 1976 |
| |
|
Lichen-rock type. |
Lichen stand types.
Areas of bare rock from steep lava cliffs to the conical peaks on the mesa surface. |
| |
Grasslands
- Short-grass grassland. Bouteloua gracilis, Bromus tectorum,
with Alyssum parviflorum, and Opuntia sp., Echinocereus viridiflorus,
Escobaria missouriensis,
Escobaria vivipara var. vivipara.
Also Hesperostipa comata (Syn: Stipa c.), and Yucca glauca.
Some short shrubs of Chrysothamnus nauseosus ssp. graveolens,
Prunus virginiana (Syn: Padus v.),
Rhus aromatica ssp. trilobata.
Celtis reticulata at edge of mesa.
Traditionally dominated by Bouteloua gracilis and Buchloe dactyloides,
but now dominated by Bromus tectorum.
|
Grassland type. Bromus tectorum and Alyssum simplex (Syn: A. minus.
Occasional Achnatherum scribneri (Syn: Stipa s.) and
Andropogon gerardii. |
Mixed-grass stand types.
Dominated by Bromus tectorum and Agropyron sp. (Elymus sp. ?),
with Buchloe dactyloides, and Alyssum alyssoides, Eriogonum umbellatum Torr.,
Heterotheca villosa, Opuntia compressa, Yucca glauca,
and Ericameria nauseosa (Syn: Chrysothamnus nauseosus).
West, south, and east exposures.
|
|
| Mixed-grass grassland.
Stipa comata, Pascopyrum smithii, Bouteloua gracilis,
Bromus tectorum, with Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua curtipendula,
Aristida purpurea,
and Nassella viridula, with a large number of forbs.
Mesa slopes and toe areas of STM.
|
| RM Aspen Forest and Woodland |
- |
- |
- |
| RM Cliff, Canyon and Massive Bedrock |
- |
- |
- |
| RM Dry-Mesic and Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland |
- |
- |
- |
| SRM Pinyon-Juniper Woodland |
- |
- |
- |
| SRM Ponderosa Pine Woodland |
- |
- |
- |
Rocky Mountain Lower Montane - Foothill Shrubland.
- Cercocarpus montanus Shrubland Alliance
- Series determination requires more data collection.
|
Upland shrubland. Cercoparpus montanus, with sparse cover of Bromus tectorum
intermixed with Hesperostipa comata (Syn: Stipa c.),
Yucca glauca, and many cacti.
Ravine shrubland. Skunkbush, chokecherry and Prunus americana, in dense thickets.
Few plains cottonwoods and Salix
amygdaloides |
Shrubland type
- Mixed shrub community.
Symphoricarpos occidentalis, Cercocarpus montanus,
Rhus [aromatica] ssp. trilobata, Ribes cereum,
Prunus americana, and Prunus virginiana.
Understory of Poa pratensis, Bromus tectorum,
Elymus trachycaulus (Syn: Agropyron trachycaulum),
Eriogonum umbellatum, Alyssum alyssoides, etc.
|
Mixed shrub stand types.
Rhus [aromatica] ssp. trilobata, Ribes cereum Dougl.,
Symphoricarpos occidentalis, Cercocarpus montanus,
Prunus virginiana L., Prunus americana Marsh. Acer glabrum in dense patches.
Mostly north exposures. |
| |
|
Shrubland type.
- Mountain mahogany community.
Cercocarpus montanus with an understory of
Alyssum alysoides, Bromus tectorum,
Agropyron cristatum (Syn: A. desertorum),
Eriogonum umbellatum, etc.
|
Pure shrub stand types. Cercocarpus montanus, with Bromus tectorum,
Alyssum alyssoides, and Eriogonum
umbellatum. |
| |
|
Grassland-shrub type.
Common foothills species: Symphoricarpos occidentalis, Prunus americana,
Rhus trilobata, and Ribes cereum.
Grasses are Poa pratensis, Bromus tectorum,
and Elymus trachycaulus (Syn: Agropyron trachycaulum).
Also Cercoparpus montanus,
Symphoricarpos rotundifolius (Syn: S. oreophilus),
Prunus virginiana melanocarpa, Rosa arkansana, Physocarpus monogynus,
and Ribes aureum.
Shrub cover within grassland matrix is significant, but less than 50%.
|
Shrub-grass stand types.
Shrubs of Crataegus succulenta (Syn: C. erythropoda),
Rosa sp., Rhus trilobata,
Prunus virginiana, Prunus americana, Celtus reticulata,
and Ribes cereum, with Agropyron sp. (Syn: Elymus sp. ?),
Bromus tectorum,
Achnatherum hymenoides (Syn: Oryzopsis h.,
and Alyssum alyssoides.
Patches of shrubs in mixed grass-forb areas. |
| NA Arid West Emergent Marsh |
- |
- |
- |
| |
Wetlands. Cottonwoods and willows, with Carex spp., and Juncus spp.,
and a variety of grasses and forbs. Patches of Typha spp..
Hydrology alteration. |
|
Riparian (streamside) stand types. Salix exigua, Populus sargentii,
Eleocharis macrostachya, Scirpus lacustris L., and
Mentha spicata L. |
| |
|
Woodland type.
- Mountain maple community.
Dense community of small Acer glabrum just below cliffs or in ravines
with a dense understory of mixed shrub. North and east slopes.
- Cottonwood woodland community.
Scattered cottonwoods
(Populus deltoides ssp. monilifera (Syn: P. sargentii), and P. angustifolia)
along permanent and intermittent streams.
In Big Ravine, Acer negundo, Salix exigua, and S. amygdaloides also occur.
Other shrubs also form a dense understory.
- Juniper Savannah community.
Juniperus scopulorum with an understory of typical grassland.
|
Woodland stand types. Juniperus scopulorum, with Bromus tectorum. |
| WGP (Western Great Plains) Cliff, Outcrop, and Shale Barrens |
- |
- |
- |
| WGP (Western Great Plains) Closed Depression Wetland |
- |
- |
- |
| WGP (Western Great Plains) Foothill and Piedmont Grassland |
- |
- |
- |
| WGP (Western Great Plains) Riparian Woodland, Shrubland and Herbaceous |
- |
- |
- |
| WGP (Western Great Plains) Shortgrass Prairie |
- |
- |
- |
| |
Disturbed/reclaimed |
|
|
| |
Developed |
|
|
Notes:
- [R3C3] Stipa comata grassland of 30-60 acres near western rim of mountain, may be partly due to effects of the 1988 fire.
|
|
|
Ecological Systems Recognized by the Colorado Natural Heritage System
|
|
Literature Cited:
- Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 2005.
|
Ecological systems are dynamic assemblages or complexes of plant and/or animal communities that 1) occur together on the landscape; 2) are tied together by similar ecological processes, underlying abiotic environmental factors or gradients; and 3) form a readily identifiable unit on the ground. These systems provide a coarser level unit than plant associations and alliances as defined under the International Vegetation Classification standard, and are more easily identified on the ground.
The descriptions and summarized viability guidelines presented here are intended to serve as a tool for conservation and management planning by providing a context for conservation and management (i.e., what systems do we have in Colorado), and by providing easy access to ranking and evaluation criteria for key ecological attributes of each system (i.e., what is the condition of our systems).
System descriptions and viability guidelines are based on materials compiled by NatureServe or developed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program. Funding for the development of these documents was provided in part by the Bureau of Land Management, The Nature Conservancy, and the USDA Forest Service
(CNHP, 2005).
|
|
Literature Cited:
- Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project (SWReGAP)
|
|
Literature Cited:
- Rondeau, R., K. Decker, J. Handwerk, J. Siemers, L. Grunau, and C. Pague, 2011.
|
The Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project (SWReGAP) was a mapping and assessment of biodiversity for the five-state region encompassing Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. The area comprises approximately 150 million hectares (560,000 square miles) representing 1/5 the coterminous United States. The primary objective of the project was to use a coordinated approach to create detailed, seamless maps of the land cover, habitat for native terrestrial vertebrate species, land stewardship, and management status for the Southwest region. This information was analyzed to identify animal species habitats and natural land cover types that are underrepresented on land managed for their long term conservation. SWReGAP was a multi-institutional effort with scientists based in all five southwest states.
|
|
|
USNVC -- United States National Vegetation Classification
|
|
|
http://usnvc.org/
|
|
|
The U.S. National Vegetation Classification is supported by a formal partnership between the federal agencies, the Ecological Society of America (ESA), and NatureServe, working through the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Vegetation Subcommittee. Primary signators include the U.S. Forest Service (which chairs the subcommittee), ESA, NatureServe, and the U.S. Geological Survey Core Science Systems (USGS/CSS). Together we are committed to supporting the implementation and maintenance of the National Vegetation Classification (NVC) Standard (FGDC 2008).
|
|
|
The overall objective of the Vegetation and Information Standards is to support the use of a consistent national vegetation classification system (NVCS) to produce uniform statistics in vegetation resources from vegetation cover data at the national level. It is important that, as agencies map or inventory vegetated Earth cover, they collect enough data accurately and precisely to translate it for national reporting, aggregation, and comparisons. Adoption of the Vegetation Classification and Information Standards in subsequent development and application of vegetation mapping schemes will facilitate the compilation of regional and national summaries. In turn, the consistent collection of such information will eventually support the detailed, quantitative, geo-referenced basis for vegetation cover modeling, mapping, and analysis at the field level.
|
|
|
EcoVeg
|
|
Literature Cited:
- Faber-Langendoen, Dom, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Dave Tart, Bruce Hoagland, Carmen Josse, Gonzalo Navarro, Serguei Ponomarenko, Jean-Peirre Saucier, Alan Weakley, and Patrick Comer, 2014.
|
http://www.natureserve.org/biodiversity-science/publications/ecoveg-new-approach-vegetation-description-and-classification
|
|
Studies of Prairie or Foothill Ecosystems
| |
|
Restoration and Effects of Attempts Thereof
| |
|
Wilson, Scott D., 1989. The suppression of native prairie by alien species introduced for revegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning. 17(2), april 1989, pp. 113-119.
|
Abstract
Natural prairie has become uncommon in North America, making the revegetation of disturbed areas by native species a desirable goal. Alien species are often introduced for revegetation because of their abilities to stabilize and nitrify soil. The objective of this study was to test whether these attributes of introduced species would allow them to promote the recovery of native vegetation. Seven treatments (six commercially-available mixtures of introduced species and an unseeded control) were applied to a randomized field experiment in disturbed mixed-grass prairie in south-west Manitoba, Canada. Sampling eight years later revealed that introduced species suppressed native vegetation. Introduced species did not aid revegetation: plots seeded with introduced species did not produce significantly higher standing crop or below-ground biomass than did unseeded plots. Unseeded plots had the lowest frequency of bare ground. Allowing prairie to revegetate without sowing introduced species produced both the highest cover of bare ground and the greatest abundance of native species.
|
| |
|
Wilson, Scott D., and Joyce W. Belcher, 1989. Plant and Bird Communities of Native Prairie and Intoduced Eurasian Vegetation in Manitoba, Canada. Conservation Biology. 3(1), pp. 39-44, March 1989.
“… introduction of Eurasian plant species to North American prairie not only replaces the native plant community, but also produces significant changes in the species composition of a higher trophic level … ”
|
Abstract: Large areas of North American prairie are dominated by Eurasian plant species introduced either for range improvement or accidentally as weeds. We examined the impact of introduced plants on both native vegetation and bird communities in a mosaic of North American mixed-grass prairie and Eurasian vegetation. We established ten transects five in areas of native prairie and five in areas dominated by introduced plant species. Each transect comprised five sampling stations separated by 100 m. Vegetation was sampled in four 0.5m2 quadrats at each station. The cooers of eight of the ten most common plant species varied significantly (p < 0.05) between native and introduced vegetation. One common native plans Andropogon scoparius, was absent in introduced vegetation Singing birds were identified to species at each station on three occasions during the breeding season All bird species found were native to prairie. The total number of birds did not vary between vegetation types Two out of eight bird species, upland sandpiper and Sprague's pipit were signifcantly more abundant in native prairie than in introduced vegetation No bird species were significantly more common in introduced vegetation. A correlation matrix calculated for all bird species and the ten most abundant plant species divided the bird community into two groups. The first group (western meadow lark, upland sandpiper, Sprague's pipit, Baird's sparrow and savannah sparrow) was positively correlated with native plant species and negatively with introduced plants, while the second (vesper sparrow, clay-colored sparrow, and grasshopper sparrow) was negatively correlated with native species and positively correlated with introduced Discriminant analysis separated transects from native and Eurasian vegetation on the basis of their respective bird communities. The results illustrate that the introduction of Eurasian plant species to North American prairie not only replaces the native plant community, but also produces significant changes in the species composition of a higher trophic level.
|
| |
|
Heidinga, Lawrence, and Scott D. Wilson, 2002.
The Impact of an Invading Alien Grass (Agropyron cristatum) on Species Turnover in Native Prairie.
Diversity and Distributions.
8(5), September 2002, pp 249-258.
|
Abstract
Alien invasions typically reduce species richness of habitats, but few studies have examined their effects on species turnover, the difference in species composition between localities. Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. (crested wheat grass) has been planted on 6-10 million ha of North American prairie, and is invading native prairie. We studied the invasion of A. cristatum into native prairie by measuring species composition along a gradient from maximum to minimum A. cristatum abundance. As A. cristatum increased, the abundance of most common native species decreased, but one appeared to be unaffected (Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) Lag.), and another (Poa sandbergii Vasey) increased. The effect of A. cristatum on species turnover was investigated by examining species-area curves for areas from 0.5 m2 to 8.0 m2. Species diversity was reduced by 35% at high A. cristatum abundances at all areas. A. cristatum reduced the intercept of the species-area curve, but not the slope, suggesting that A. cristatum affected species turnover proportionally in all areas and habitats. This unusual result may indicate a homogeneous environment where species are distributed randomly. A. cristatum produced almost twice as many seeds as all native grasses combined. The number of seeds collected of native grasses and A. cristatum was highly correlated with the number of seed heads immediately nearby, but not with transect position. This suggests most seeds were dispersed over distances less than 5 m. In sum, the invasion of native prairie by A. cristatum might be related to high rates of seed production, and has the effect of decreasing species turnover by reducing the intercept of the species-area curve.
|
| |
|
Salesman, Jessica Bolwahn, and Meredith Thomsen, 2011. Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis) in Tallgrass Prairies: A Review of Control Methods and Future Research Directions. Ecological Restoration. 29(4), December 2011, pp. 374-381.
|
Abstract.
Smooth brome (Bromus inermis) is a cool-season rhizomatous grass of Eurasian origin
that has escaped intentional plantings and spread widely in natural areas. A large body of work exists regarding smooth brome's biology and response to conservation management strategies designed to reduce its competitive effects on native prairie species, particularly for the tallgrass prairies of North America. Here we summarize that literature to improve restoration practice. In tallgrass prairie, smooth brome benefits from the early start of its growing season and its rhizomatous growth form, making it a strong competitor against native warm-season grasses. Late-spring burns timed to target smooth brome when root reserves are at their lowest have shown promise as a control strategy. Uncertainty remains, however, about the relative efficacy of fire, herbicide, mowing, or grazing to accomplish late-spring defoliation, the effect of repeated treatments, and the potential benefits of treatment combinations. The responses of resident or seeded natives to brome control treatments and/or the resulting decreases in brome cover also remain largely unexamined. Research focused on the questions we highlight would reduce costs associated with the control of smooth brome and increase confidence in the outcomes of restoration efforts.
|
| |
|
Grant, Todd A., Bridgette Flanders-Wanner, Terry L. Shaffer, Robert K. Murphy, and Gregg A. Knutsen, 2009.
An Emerging Crisis across Northern Prairie Refuges: Prevalence of Invasive Plants and a Plan for Adaptive Management.
Ecological Restoration.
27(1), March 2009, pp. 58-65.
|
Abstract
In the northern Great Plains, native prairies managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) can be pivotal in conservation of North America's biological diversity. From 2002 to 2006, we surveyed 7,338 belt transects to assess the general composition of mixed-grass and tallgrass prairie vegetation across five "complexes" (i.e., administrative groupings) of national wildlife refuges managed by the Service in North Dakota and South Dakota. Native grasses and forbs were common (mean frequency of occurrence 47%-54%) on two complexes but uncommon (4%-13%) on two others. Conversely, an introduced species of grass, smooth brome (Bromus inermis), accounted for 45% to 49% of vegetation on two complexes and another species, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) accounted for 27% to 36% of the vegetation on three of the complexes. Our data confirm prior suspicions of widespread invasion by introduced species of plants on Service-owned tracts of native prairie, changes that likely stem in part from a common management history of little or no disturbance (e.g., defoliation by grazing or fire). However, variability in the degree and type of invasion among prairie tracts suggests that knowledge of underlying causes (e.g., edaphic or climatic factors, management histories) could help managers more effectively restore prairies. We describe an adaptive management approach to acquire such knowledge while progressing with restoration. More specifically, we propose to use data from inventories of plant communities on Service-owned prairies to design and implement, as experiments, optimal restoration strategies. We will then monitor these experiments and use the results to refine future strategies. This comprehensive, process-oriented approach should yield reliable and robust recommendations for restoration and maintenance of native prairies in the northern Great Plains.
|
| |
|
Recreation in Foothill and Prairie Ecosystems
|
|
If you have a question or a comment you may write to me at:
tomas@schweich.com
I sometimes post interesting questions in my FAQ, but I never disclose your full name or address.
|
[Home Page] [Site Map]
Date and time this article was prepared:
8/1/2026 3:14:17 PM
|
|